A plus in the cheat is weather modulation, which most cheats don't have built-in. I have seen some people have beautiful, clean visuals, but that was with the help of javascripts, which I will get in to later. Everything works as intended, but not really much room for really amazing-looking visuals.
Really only has the basics for chams and modulatin.Has always had a much better, more customizable legitbot, works very well, easy to not get overwatched.The smoothing doesn't work very well, it is not as customizable as Aimware, and generally just doesn't perform well at all and will get you overwatched pretty quickly. I have seen it work really well, but from what I have seen, heard, and used myself, it is still, and probably will always be, below Onetap's level. Has always fallen behind in AA, devs seem to make it worse in every update, and I always see people complain constantly about the Anti-Aim.
#Aimware namechanger not working update#
New V3.5 update didn't do too much to the AA, but from my last time of using (roughly 3 weeks ago), the AA seemed very good. Has pretty good AA, pretty customizable, works really well and you can make people dump fairly easily before they bruteforce.Generally, not worth it if you want it for it's ragebot.I have been using Aimware V5 for months, and last time I used it, with a paid config, I went 19-22, which is not good at all. The ragebot can be godly, as some users will say, but it is almost impossible to have a decent time with it. I never see any AW users have a good KD in servers, and I almost never see any top-leaderboarding. From what I have heard, and used, in the past couple months, Aimware's ragebot is on a general half-decent level.Again, more options for customizing the ragebot on Onetap, but Aimware simplifies configging a little bit better for rage, albeit having a far worse ragebot. The resolver is better than Aimware's and the prediction seems about the same, but Onetap will still usually pull ahead. The doubletap is more customizable, and more consistent and accurate. The auto is better, the scout is WAY better, the AWP is generally the same performance. Always has been, and most likely always will be. Here is where Onetap prevails, and will always prevail.The average new user on Aimware's menu will have a much easier time understanding the menu and getting used to it. Much more consistent menu, configuring is easier on Aimware’s menu, although they definitely do not seem to have as many options as Onetap does.There are options in visuals that should be in misc, misc options that should be in visuals, you have to config each individual gun instead of a gun category (which I, and pretty much everyone I talk to HATES), and configging a simple ragebot requires you to click through literally 10+ different subtabs, whereas in the old Onetap, it was all in one tab, and we all loved that (BRING BACK V2 MENU) I know for a fact the first time I used Onetap (version 3.5, technically) I was literally taken aback by how the new menu looked. Although everything is clearly cut out in the menu, there are subtabs for subtabs for sub-options, and the amount of options and tabs will most likely confuse the user if they have never used it before. Anyone who has never used Onetap will have a hard time configuring. Keep in mind that all things said are my own opinion, you may not agree with them. Also, all points will be made for the general newcomers, or people that have never used either cheat or have not used the current version.
I will be comparing both cheats with these points in mind, and provide you with the best answer on which cheat you should go for for each point. I will be touching on these things in this post: I will try to make this post as helpful as possible for the people who want to know. I am making this post to hopefully put to rest the numerous posts of "Onetap or Aimware?" Because they seem to be daily and hopefully if someone wants to know in the future they can use the searchbar and read this post.
0 kommentar(er)
